Tweet
IS CRAIG COBB WHITE?
Yes, the title of this thread is provocative, and painfully so. As such, it is intended to stimulate a discussion among all deep-thinkers within the world-wide white nationalist community – a discussion that has simmered and bubbled just below the surface for decades now – if not since white men first made contact, and miscegenated, with negroids. A discussion that asks:
Who Is White?
Most who claim to know what “white” means typically offer definitions that usually do not stand up to logical examination and critical scrutiny. For instance, over on Stormfront, there are those who loudly proclaim that any given “white man” who otherwise LOOKS WHITE but nevertheless has 1/100 Jewish (Semitic) DNA is not white, but that another “white man” who is 1/16 (about 6/100 – or six times the amount of non-white DNA) does qualify as “white”.
In such cases, it is clear that the man with 1/100 Semitic DNA is being denied “whiteness” largely for ideological reasons – rather than for actual scientific ones. This phenomenon has persisted throughout (what henceforth will be deemed) the Internet Age, either blatantly hinted at in the late David Lane’s essay, “Who Is White?”, wherein he alludes that anyone “who looks white, acts white, and thinks white” is, a priori, WHITE. This viewpoint is widely accepted in the White Nationalist Eurosphere, though certainly not by all. In other words, if you look white to another white – you are therefore white. No further validation is needed, and certainly nothing so extreme and invasive as a DNA test.
The problem with this definition of “whiteness” is that there are those who look absolutely white, but who would clearly fail a DNA test. Does this mean they are NOT white? Ah, there’s the rub...
As we teeter on the brink of the year 2014 a well-known white nationalist – white by all outward appearances – has utterly failed a DNA test. At the moment, the validity of that test is still up in the air. Was it fraudulent? Was it manipulated in some way in order to achieve some ulterior motive of the Cultural Marxists who control the television media? Very likely, most WN’s agree.
Still…
The DNA test that white nationalist activist Craig Cobb took is nonetheless troubling. Manipulated, perhaps. But…what if it wasn’t? What if Craig Cobb genuinely harbors non-white DNA? Not negroid DNA, most would agree. But perhaps DNA of another origin, such as Jewish-Semitic, Arab-Semitic, or Berber? Something that would taint his otherwise European DNA, yet not his actual phenotype or physiology. Many white nationalists would agree it is at least possible.
But the BIG QUESTION remains: If Craig Cobb’s DNA test is accurate and scientifically true – a DNA test evincing 14% - or almost 1/7 non-white ancestry…
…IS HE STILL WHITE?
If the answer is YES, since Craig Cobb obviously remains “white” in appearance, then does this not open the door to every “white” among us (with even less non-white DNA, be it Amerindian, Mongoloid, Negroid, and, perhaps most importantly – Semitic) to claim membership in the White Race?
If the answer is NO, then is the white nationalist movement prepared to ruthlessly expel and expunge Craig Cobb forever from our ranks, to deny him all future contact with us, to reject, repudiate, to even scorn and ridicule him with utter contempt, so as to insure his kind will never darken our midst again?
This, then, is the critical dilemma that Craig Cobb – above all others before him – has brought forcefully front and center. It is a dilemma that must now be faced – and answered. So much now rests on our collective response. For if we should deem Craig Cobb as “white”, we have decisively opened the floodgates for Jews to join our WN ranks – albeit only Jews who look (and invariably must look) every bit as white as Craig Cobb. To deny such Jews membership in our racial ranks would be a major blow against our vaunted claim to champion Truth above all else, as well as send a worldwide message that we are, as a group, but irrational hypocrites of the most despicable order.
Or will we white nationalists remain true to our long-held “one drop” rule, and banish Craig Cobb from our midst, as well as any and all WN’s who attempt to make apologies, excuses, or “explanations” for the hard reality that forever denies him admittance within our ranks.
Craig Cobb.
Is he White?
Or is he mud?
If there are those among you who believe we should permit Craig Cobb to remain in the WN movement (even if it turns out after new DNA testing) that he IS 14% non-white, then by all logic we MUST...
...ACCEPT this beautiful blonde woman as a fellow "white", should she too wish to join our white nationalist ranks - despite the fact that she is a JEW:
Erin Heatherton, Super-Model - Born Erin Heather Bubley - Both parents Jews
Yes, the title of this thread is provocative, and painfully so. As such, it is intended to stimulate a discussion among all deep-thinkers within the world-wide white nationalist community – a discussion that has simmered and bubbled just below the surface for decades now – if not since white men first made contact, and miscegenated, with negroids. A discussion that asks:
Who Is White?
Most who claim to know what “white” means typically offer definitions that usually do not stand up to logical examination and critical scrutiny. For instance, over on Stormfront, there are those who loudly proclaim that any given “white man” who otherwise LOOKS WHITE but nevertheless has 1/100 Jewish (Semitic) DNA is not white, but that another “white man” who is 1/16 (about 6/100 – or six times the amount of non-white DNA) does qualify as “white”.
In such cases, it is clear that the man with 1/100 Semitic DNA is being denied “whiteness” largely for ideological reasons – rather than for actual scientific ones. This phenomenon has persisted throughout (what henceforth will be deemed) the Internet Age, either blatantly hinted at in the late David Lane’s essay, “Who Is White?”, wherein he alludes that anyone “who looks white, acts white, and thinks white” is, a priori, WHITE. This viewpoint is widely accepted in the White Nationalist Eurosphere, though certainly not by all. In other words, if you look white to another white – you are therefore white. No further validation is needed, and certainly nothing so extreme and invasive as a DNA test.
The problem with this definition of “whiteness” is that there are those who look absolutely white, but who would clearly fail a DNA test. Does this mean they are NOT white? Ah, there’s the rub...
As we teeter on the brink of the year 2014 a well-known white nationalist – white by all outward appearances – has utterly failed a DNA test. At the moment, the validity of that test is still up in the air. Was it fraudulent? Was it manipulated in some way in order to achieve some ulterior motive of the Cultural Marxists who control the television media? Very likely, most WN’s agree.
Still…
The DNA test that white nationalist activist Craig Cobb took is nonetheless troubling. Manipulated, perhaps. But…what if it wasn’t? What if Craig Cobb genuinely harbors non-white DNA? Not negroid DNA, most would agree. But perhaps DNA of another origin, such as Jewish-Semitic, Arab-Semitic, or Berber? Something that would taint his otherwise European DNA, yet not his actual phenotype or physiology. Many white nationalists would agree it is at least possible.
But the BIG QUESTION remains: If Craig Cobb’s DNA test is accurate and scientifically true – a DNA test evincing 14% - or almost 1/7 non-white ancestry…
…IS HE STILL WHITE?
If the answer is YES, since Craig Cobb obviously remains “white” in appearance, then does this not open the door to every “white” among us (with even less non-white DNA, be it Amerindian, Mongoloid, Negroid, and, perhaps most importantly – Semitic) to claim membership in the White Race?
If the answer is NO, then is the white nationalist movement prepared to ruthlessly expel and expunge Craig Cobb forever from our ranks, to deny him all future contact with us, to reject, repudiate, to even scorn and ridicule him with utter contempt, so as to insure his kind will never darken our midst again?
This, then, is the critical dilemma that Craig Cobb – above all others before him – has brought forcefully front and center. It is a dilemma that must now be faced – and answered. So much now rests on our collective response. For if we should deem Craig Cobb as “white”, we have decisively opened the floodgates for Jews to join our WN ranks – albeit only Jews who look (and invariably must look) every bit as white as Craig Cobb. To deny such Jews membership in our racial ranks would be a major blow against our vaunted claim to champion Truth above all else, as well as send a worldwide message that we are, as a group, but irrational hypocrites of the most despicable order.
Or will we white nationalists remain true to our long-held “one drop” rule, and banish Craig Cobb from our midst, as well as any and all WN’s who attempt to make apologies, excuses, or “explanations” for the hard reality that forever denies him admittance within our ranks.
Craig Cobb.
Is he White?
Or is he mud?
An extract from a VNN forum post from ten years ago (December 12, 2003) wherein two forum members - "The Final Solution" and "On Your Knees Nigger Boy" conducted this exchange:
The Final Solution: "Yggdrasil has stated that Jews should be welcomed as citizens in a "Euro-American" state".
Whereby On Your Knees Nigger Boy replied: "Yggdrasil is an intelligent individual. Even so, he has not resolved the issue of the Jews to everyone's satisfaction. As I pointed out on another thread, David Lane (who coined the '14 Words' slogan) believes that any individual who "looks white, acts white, and thinks white" IS white. He made no exceptions for Jews in this regard, it should be noted.
So, do we reject blond-haired, blue-eyed Jews who look totally un-Jewish in every regard, while accepting dark-haired, dark-eyed whites who are 1/16 or even 1/8 native American Indian, as many on Stormfront forum say we should?
Where do we draw the line? And, who draws it? No consensus on this matter has been established. But, logically, if we reject fair-haired, Aryan-looking Jews, then we should reject 'whites' with 1/8 native American Indian blood as well, even if they look like a Hitler Jugend poster boy. To do otherwise only injects the whole issue with illogic, and thus makes the whole white nationalist movement look irrational and foolish.
The Final Solution: "Yggdrasil has stated that Jews should be welcomed as citizens in a "Euro-American" state".
Whereby On Your Knees Nigger Boy replied: "Yggdrasil is an intelligent individual. Even so, he has not resolved the issue of the Jews to everyone's satisfaction. As I pointed out on another thread, David Lane (who coined the '14 Words' slogan) believes that any individual who "looks white, acts white, and thinks white" IS white. He made no exceptions for Jews in this regard, it should be noted.
So, do we reject blond-haired, blue-eyed Jews who look totally un-Jewish in every regard, while accepting dark-haired, dark-eyed whites who are 1/16 or even 1/8 native American Indian, as many on Stormfront forum say we should?
Where do we draw the line? And, who draws it? No consensus on this matter has been established. But, logically, if we reject fair-haired, Aryan-looking Jews, then we should reject 'whites' with 1/8 native American Indian blood as well, even if they look like a Hitler Jugend poster boy. To do otherwise only injects the whole issue with illogic, and thus makes the whole white nationalist movement look irrational and foolish.
...ACCEPT this beautiful blonde woman as a fellow "white", should she too wish to join our white nationalist ranks - despite the fact that she is a JEW:
Erin Heatherton, Super-Model - Born Erin Heather Bubley - Both parents Jews
Comment